Analysis of vocational interests and student’s perception of work-based on society 5.0 towards learning outcomes

  • Muhammad Anwar 
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia

Abstract

The challenge of education in Indonesia with the entry of the era of society 5.0 requires efforts to improve student learning outcomes, especially engineering education students. This paper focuses on looking at the influence of vocational interest on learning outcomes, perceptions of the world of work based on society 5.0 on learning outcomes, and vocational interests and perceptions of the world of work together on learning outcomes. The results of the study found that (1) there was a significant influence between vocational interest on student learning outcomes by 10.3%, (2) there was a significant influence between perceptions of the world of work based on society 5.0 on student learning outcomes by 11.3% and (3) there is a joint influence of vocational interest and perceptions of the world of work based on society 5.0 on student learning outcomes by 16%. Thus, it can be concluded that vocational interest and perceptions about the world of work based on society 5.0 are two factors that contribute to student learning outcomes. This means that the higher the vocational interest and perception of the world of work based on society 5.0, the student learning outcomes will tend to be higher.
Keywords
  • Vocational Interest
  • Perception of the World of Work
  • Society 5.0
  • Learning Outcomes
  • Engineering Education
References
  1. Ali, M. (2021). Vocational students’ perception and readiness in facing globalization, industry revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1833, No. 1, p. 012050). IOP Publishing.
  2. Andrianis, R., Anwar, M., & Zulwisli, Z. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Projek Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pemrograman Web Dinamis Kelas Xi Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Di Smk Negeri 2 Padang Panjang. VoteTEKNIKA: Jurnal Vocational Teknik Elektronika dan Informatika, 6(1).
  3. Annuar, Z., & Prima Zola, S. T. (2019). Pengaruh Pelaksanaan Pengalaman Lapangan Industri Terhadap Minat Memilih Profesi Guru Bagi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan. CIVED (Journal of Civil Engineering and Vocational Education), 6(3).
  4. Anwar, M. (2019). Kontribusi Self Efficacy Dan Self Regulated Terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa Kelas Xii Teknik Audio Vidio Smk N 1 Padang. Jurnal Kapita Selekta Geografi, 2(10), 1-15.
  5. Anwar, M. (2021). Problem Solving Skills Analysis of Vocational Engineering Teacher Candidates in Term of Several Variables. Journal of Education Technology, 5(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i1.33624
  6. Aryanti, L., Anwar, M., & Zulwisli, Z. (2017). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terhadap Hasil Belajar Teknik Elektronika Dasar Siswa Kelas X SMKN 5 Padang. VoteTEKNIKA: Jurnal Vocational Teknik Elektronika dan Informatika, 5(2).
  7. Atkins, L., & Flint, K. J. (2015). Nothing changes: perceptions of vocational education in England. International Journal of Training Research, 13(1), 35-48.
  8. Coşkun, S., Kayıkcı, Y., & Gençay, E. (2019). Adapting engineering education to industry 4.0 vision. Technologies, 7(1), 10.
  9. Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., & Edstrom, K. (2007). Rethinking engineering education. The CDIO Approach, 302, 60-62.
  10. Duque, L. C. (2014). A framework for analysing higher education performance: students' satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and dropout intentions. Total quality management & business excellence, 25(1-2), 1-21.
  11. Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E., & Rugarcia, A. (2000). The future of engineering education: Part 2. Teaching methods that work. Chemical engineering education, 34(1), 26-39.
  12. Ganefri, Hidayat, H., Kusumaningrum, I., & Mardin, A. (2017). Needs Analysis of Entrepreneurship Pedagogy of Technology and Vocational Education with Production Based Learning Approach in Higher Education. International Journal of Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7, 1701-1707. http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.5.1510
  13. Ganefri, G., Hidayat, H., Yulastri, A., Mardin, A., Sriwahyuni, D., & Zoni, A. A. (2018). Perangkat Pembelajaran Pedagogi Entrepreneurship Dengan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berbasis Produk di Pendidikan Vokasi. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Internasional, 1(1).
  14. Gladden, M. E. (2019). Who will be the members of society 5.0? Towards an anthropology of technologically posthumanized future societies. Social Sciences, 1-39.
  15. Glosenberg, A., Tracey, T.J.G., Behrend, T.S., Bluestein, D.L., & Foster, L.L. (2019). Person-vocational fit across the world of work: Evaluating the generalizability of the circular model of vocational interests and social cognitive career theory across 74 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 92-108.
  16. Hidayat, H. (2015). Production based Learning: An Instructional Design Model in the context of vocational education and training (VET). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 206-211.
  17. Hidayat, H. (2017a). How is the Application and Design of a Product-Based Entrepreneurship Learning Tools in Vocational Higher Education?. In International Conference on Technology and Vocational Teachers (ICTVT 2017) (pp. 223-228). Atlantis Press.
  18. Hidayat, H. (2017b). Impact of learning with the production-based learning model in vocational school. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Social Sciences, 7(2), 1-6.
  19. Hidayat, H., Herawati, S., Tamin, B. Y., & Syahmaidi, E. (2018a). How is the practicality of technopreneurship Scientific learning model design in vocational higher education?. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 6(09).
  20. Hidayat, H., Herawati, S., Syahmaidi, E., Hidayati, A., & Ardi, Z. (2018b). Designing of technopreneurship scientific learning framework in vocational-based higher education in Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(4), 123-127.
  21. Hidayat, H., & Yuliana. (2018). The Influence of Entrepreneurship Education and Family Background on Students’ Entrepreneurial Interest in Nutritious Traditional Food Start Ups in Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE). 7(4), 118-122. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.9.20631
  22. Hidayat, H., Tamin, B. Y., Herawati, S., Khairul, K., & Syahmaidi, E. (2019a). The contribution of technopreneurship scientific learning and learning readiness towards the entrepreneurship learning outcomes in higher vocational education. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 9(1), 21-32.
  23. Hidayat, H., Ardi, Z., Yuliana, & Herawati, S. (2019b). Exploration of the need analysis for technopreneurship scientific learning models in higher vocational education. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 18(3), 356-368.
  24. Hidayat, H., Tamin, B.Y., Herawati, S., Hidayati, A., Muji, A.P. (2019c). Implementation of technopreneurship scientific learning for produce electronic product prototypes in engineering education. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(11), 2842-2846. http://dx.doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.K2406.0981119
  25. Hidayat, H., Tamin, B. Y., Herawati, S., Ardi, Z., & Muji, A. P. (2020). The Contribution of Internal Locus of Control and Self-Concept to Career Maturity in Engineering Education. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol, 10(6), 2282-2289.
  26. Higashihara, T. (2018). A Search for Unicorns and the Building of Society 5.0. World Economic Forum, Davos.
  27. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, Fla.: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  28. Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2016). Where is the engineering I applied for? A longitudinal study of students' transition into higher education engineering, and their considerations of staying or leaving. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(2), 154-171.
  29. Inayat, I., ul Amin, R., Inayat, Z., & Salim, S. S. (2013). Influence s of collaborative web based vocational education and training (VET) on learning outcomes. Computers & education, 68, 153-166.
  30. Jüttler, A., Schumann, S., Neuenschwander, M. P., & Hofmann, J. (2021). General or Vocational Education? The Role of Vocational Interests in Educational Decisions at the End of Compulsory School in Switzerland. Vocations and Learning, 14(1), 115-145.
  31. Kartika, S., Husni, H., & Millah, S. (2019). Pengaruh Kualitas Sarana Dan Prasarana Terhadap Minat Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam,[SL], 7(1), 113-126.
  32. Koh, E. T., & Owen, W. L. (2000). Descriptive research and qualitative research. In Introduction to Nutrition and Health research, 219-248. Springer, Boston, MA.
  33. Kokou, A, Atitsogbe., I, A, Moumoula., S, Rochat., J, P, Antonietti, & J, Rossier. (2018). Vocational Interests and Career Indecision in Switzerland and Burkina Faso : Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 107, 126-140
  34. Korkusuz, M. E., Durak, G., & Ari, N. K. (2020). Metaphoric Perceptions Of Undergraduate And High School Students About The Concepts Of Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 14(2).
  35. Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European journal of psychology of education, 14(1), 23-40.
  36. Kumaidi, K., Farida, R., & Haq, A. H. B. (2017). Skala Minat Kejuruan: Strategi Mengenali Minat Vokasi Siswa. URECOL, 553-562.
  37. Lakin, J. M., Wittig, A. H., Davis, E. W., & Davis, V. A. (2020). Am I an engineer yet? Perceptions of engineering and identity among first year students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(2), 214-231.
  38. Lee, Y. J., Chao, C. H., & Chen, C. Y. (2011). The influences of interest in learning and learning hours on learning outcomes of vocational college students in Taiwan: using a teacher’s instructional attitude as the moderator. Global journal of engineering education, 13(3), 140-153.
  39. McDowall, T., Jackling, B., & Natoli, R. (2015). Relationships between vocational interests and learning approaches to advance the quality of student learning in accounting. Accounting Education, 24(6), 498-513.
  40. Minnaert, A., Boekaerts, M., De Brabander, C., & Opdenakker, M. C. (2011). Students’ experiences of autonomy, competence, social relatedness and interest within a CSCL environment in vocational education: The case of commerce and business administration. Vocations and Learning, 4(3), 175.
  41. Nakanishi, H. (2019.) Modern Society Has Reached Its Limits – “Society 5.0” Will Liberate us. World Economic Forum, Davos.
  42. Nurahman, A., Widodo, W., Ishafit, I., & Saulon, B. O. (2018). The development of worksheet based on guided discovery learning method helped by phet simulations interactive media in newton's laws of motion to improve learning outcomes and interest of vocational education 10th grade students. Indonesian Review of Physics, 1(2), 37-41.
  43. O’Shea, S., Lysaght, P., & Tanner, K. (2012). Stepping into higher education from the vocational education sector in Australia: Student perceptions and experiences. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 64(3), 261-277.
  44. Polmear, M., Bielefeldt, A. R., Knight, D., Canney, N., & Swan, C. (2019). Analysis of macroethics teaching practices and perceptions in engineering: a cultural comparison. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(6), 866-881.
  45. Repelita, T. (2018). Pengaruh Persepsi Siswa Atas Kinerja Guru dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Prestasi Menulis Bahasa Indonesia pada Siswa SMA Swasta Jakarta Timur. Pujangga, 2(1), 67-120.
  46. Riduwan. (2009). Belajar Mudah Penelitian Untuk Guru dan Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung : Alfabeta.
  47. Robertson, K. F., Smeets, S., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Beyond the threshold hypothesis: Even among the gifted and top math/science graduate students, cognitive abilities, vocational interests, and lifestyle preferences matter for career choice, performance, and persistence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 346-351.
  48. Salgues, B. (2018). Society 5.0: industry of the future, technologies, methods and tools. John Wiley & Sons.
  49. Sánchez, A., Gonzalez-Gaya, C., Zulueta, P., & Sampaio, Z. (2019). Introduction of building information modeling in industrial engineering education: Students’ perception. Applied sciences, 9(16), 3287.
  50. Sneck, S., Saarnio, R., Isola, A., & Boigu, R. (2016). Medication competency of nurses according to theoretical and drug calculation online exams: A descriptive regressional study. Nurse education today, 36, 195-201.
  51. Stoll, G., Rieger, S., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Vocational interests assessed at the end of high school predict life outcomes assessed 10 years later over and above IQ and Big Five personality traits. Journal of personality and social psychology, 113(1), 167.
  52. Su, R. (2020). The three faces of interests: An integrative review of interest research in vocational, organizational, and educational psychology. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116, 103240.
  53. Sulfemi, W. B. (2019). Model pembelajaran kooperatif mind mapping berbantu audio visual dalam meningkatkan minat, motivasi dan hasil belajar IPS. Jurnal PIPSI (Jurnal Pendidikan IPS Indonesia), 4(1), 13-19.
  54. Tasrif, E. (2019). Academic Supervision Mechanism by Vocational High School Supervisor. In 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018) (pp. 160-164). Atlantis Press.
  55. Tasrif, E., Kurnia, H., Pahtoni, T. Y., Kurniadi, D., & Hadi, A. (2020). Analysis of Development Needs of Foster Parents Communication Media in Supporting Improvement of Academic Achievement of Students with Weak Socio-Economic Background. In The 1st Progress in Science and Technology Research Symposium. Redwhite Press.
  56. Tasrif, E., Saputra, H. K., Kurniadi, D., Hidayat, H., & Mubai, A. (2021). Designing Website-Based Scholarship Management Application for Teaching of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Decision Support Systems (DSS) Subjects. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(9).
  57. Trenor, J. M., Yu, S. L., Waight, C. L., Zerda, K. S., & Sha, T. L. (2008). The relations of ethnicity to female engineering students' educational experiences and college and career plans in an ethnically diverse learning environment. Journal of engineering education, 97(4), 449-465.
  58. Volodina, A., & Nagy, G. (2016). Vocational choices in adolescence: The role of gender, school achievement, self-concepts, and vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95, 58-73.
  59. Yulastri, A., & Hidayat, H. (2017). Developing an Entrepreneurship Module by Using Product-Based Learning Approach in Vocational Education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(5), 1097-1109.
  60. Yulastri, A., Hidayat, H., Ganefri, G., Edya, F., & Islami, S. (2018). Learning outcomes with the application of product based entrepreneurship module in vocational higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 8(2), 120-131.
  61. Yulastri, A., Hidayat, H., Ganefri, Ayu, R., & Ardi, Z. (2019). An Empirical Study on The Influence s of Pedagogy Learning Tools Entrepreneurship With Product-Based Learning Approach, Learning Readiness, and Locus of Control: A Case From Engineering Education in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(9), 1722-1727.
  62. Wahyuni, D. (2018). Persepsi siswa tentang keadaan psikologis sense of humor guru dengan motivasi belajar siswa kelas VII SMPN 3 Batusangkar. Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan, 1(1), 81-92.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 937 times
PDF
: 22 times