Does audit fee stickiness and audit quality are reciprocal?

  • Slamet Wahyudi 
    Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between audit fee stickiness and audit quality to determine whether they mutually affect each other. Using panel data and fixed-effects as well as common-effects regression methods, the study evaluates how total assets, leverage, audit changes, and the Covid-19 pandemic influence both variables. This methodology was chosen for its ability to control for individual differences and handle panel data, allowing for a more accurate analysis of the relationship between audit fee rigidity and audit quality. The main findings show that total assets and audit changes have a significant positive effect on audit fee stickiness, while the Covid-19 pandemic does not significantly affect audit fee stickiness. Additionally, total assets and leverage have a significant positive impact on audit quality, whereas audit changes do not influence audit quality and the Covid-19 pandemic actually improves audit quality. Although audit fee stickiness contributes to the enhancement of audit quality, audit quality does not have a significant effect on audit fee stickiness, indicating that there is no reciprocal relationship between the two. The study suggests the need for adjustments in the audit fee setting mechanism to ensure that audit quality is maintained optimally without being influenced by fee rigidity.
Keywords
  • Total Assets
  • Leverage
  • Covid-19 Pandemic
  • Audit Fee Stickiness
  • Audit Quality
References
  1. Abu-Serdaneh, J. (2014). The asymmetrical behavior of cost: evidence from Jordan. International Business Research, 7(8), 113. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v7n8p113
  2. Agustini, T. (2020). Pengaruh fee audit, audit tenure dan rotasi audit terhadap kualitas audit di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Prodi Akuntansi.
  3. Akrimi, N. (2021). The impact of coronavirus pandemic on audit quality: the perceptions of Saudi auditors. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 25(1), 1–7.
  4. Albitar, K., Gerged, A. M., Kikhia, H., & Hussainey, K. (2020). Auditing in times of social distancing: the effect of COVID-19 on auditing quality. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 29(1), 169–178.
  5. Aljaaidi, K. S., Abidin, S. Bin, & HASSAN, W. K. (2021). Audit fees and audit quality: evidence from gulf cooperation council region. AD-Minister, 38, 121–159.
  6. Alshouha, L. F., Ismail, W. N. S. W., Mokhtar, M. Z., Rashid, N. M. N. N. M., & Al-Naimi, A. A. (2022). The Impact Of Ownership Structure And Debt On Audit Quality In Non-Financial Companies Listed On Ase. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 57(6). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.57.6.60
  7. Alzeaideen, K. A., & Al, S. Z. (2018). The effect of ownership structure and corporate debt on audit quality: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(3), 51.
  8. Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., Fang, S., & Liang, Y. (2018). Cost management research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(3), 187–209.
  9. Biswas, S. (2021). Do Audit Fees Adjust Quickly?—Evidence from India. Global Business Review, 22(5), 1301–1318.
  10. Bugeja, M., Lu, M., & Shan, Y. (2015). Cost stickiness in Australia: Characteristics and determinants. Australian Accounting Review, 25(3), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12066
  11. Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., & Thomas, D. C. (2006). A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.001
  12. Cao, X., Zhao, Y., & Rong, X. (2022). Free Cash Flow, External Audit Quality and Cost Stickiness. Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on E-Business, Management and Economics, 428–434. https://doi.org/10.1145/3556089.3556167
  13. Cassell, C. A., Hansen, J. C., Myers, L. A., & Seidel, T. A. (2020). Does the timing of auditor changes affect audit quality? Evidence from the initial year of the audit engagement. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 35(2), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X17726241
  14. Chang, H., Guo, Y., & Mo, P. L. L. (2019). Market competition, audit fee stickiness, and audit quality: Evidence from China. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(2), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52173
  15. Chen, C. X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x
  16. Cullinan, C. P., Du, H., & Zheng, X. (2016). Size variables in audit fee models: An examination of the effects of alternative mathematical transformations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51460
  17. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
  18. Deis Jr, D. R., & Giroux, G. (1996). The effect of auditor changes on audit fees, audit hours, and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 15(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(95)00041-0
  19. Dewita, T. H., & Erinos, N. R. (2023). Pengaruh audit tenure, rotasi audit, dan fee audit terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 5(1), 370–384.
  20. Dhaliwal, D. S., Gleason, C. A., Heitzman, S., & Melendrez, K. D. (2008). Auditor fees and cost of debt. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0802300103
  21. Ezuwore, O., & Agbo, E. I. (2020). Relationship Between Auditor’S Independence and the Credibility of Audited Financial Statements in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting Information and Innovation, 6(9), 26–37.
  22. Farid, M. N. F., & Baradja, L. (2022). Pengaruh fee audit, audit tenure, audit rotasi, ukuran perusahaan klien pada kualitas audit. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 2(2), 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.14750
  23. Grigoras-Ichim, C.-E., Bordeianu, O.-M., & Morosan-Danila, L. (2024). The Importance Of The Financial Audit In The Identification Of Fraud And Errors Recorded By Companies. Management, 43(2), 225–240.
  24. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2012). Dasar-dasar ekonometrika. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 1.
  25. Hapipah, I. A., & Susilawati, S. (2023). Kompetensi, Independensi, Due Professional Care dan Kualitas Audit. Portofolio: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 20(2), 93–109.
  26. Harjanto, A. P., Wardhani, A. P., Yani, C., & Hajawiyah, A. (2024). The Effect of Audit Report Lag, Regulation, Audit Fee Stickiness on Audit Quality with Economic Failure as a Moderating Variable. The Accounting Journal of Binaniaga, 9(01), 85–102.
  27. Hope, O., & Thomas, W. B. (2008). Managerial empire building and firm disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 591–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00289.x
  28. Ibrahim, A. E. A., Ali, H., & Aboelkheir, H. (2022). Cost stickiness: A systematic literature review of 27 years of research and a future research agenda. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 46, 100439.
  29. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
  30. Juanda, B., & Junaidi, J. (2012). Ekonometrika deret waktu: teori dan aplikasi. IPB press.
  31. Jung, S.-H. (2015). Cost stickiness and discretionary revenues. Korean Manag. Rev, 44, 1183–1208.
  32. Kamarudin, K. A., Islam, A., Wan Ismail, W. A., & Jahan, M. A. (2022). The effect of mandatory audit firm rotation and the auditing and reporting standards on the auditor competition and audit fees relationship: Evidence from emerging markets. International Journal of Auditing, 26(2), 252–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12276
  33. Karampinis, N. I. (2024). Audit effort and audit fee stickiness. Available at SSRN 4795640.
  34. Khasanah, A., & Suryatimur, K. P. (2021). Dampak Covid-19 Terhadap Kualitas Audit Perusahaan (Studi Literatur). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 6(2), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.38043/jiab.v6i2.3186
  35. Kim, J. H. (2019). The impact of cost stickiness on audit pricing. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(5), 1–11.
  36. Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981). The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 615–641.
  37. Kuntari, Y., Chariri, A., & Nurdhiana, N. (2017). The effect of auditor ethics, auditor experience, audit fees and auditor motivation on audit quality. Sriwijaya International Journal of Dynamic Economics and Business, 203–218.
  38. Lailatul, U., & Yanthi, M. D. (2021). Pengaruh Fee Audit, Komite Audit, Rotasi Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi AKUNESA, 10(1), 35–45.
  39. Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2007). Corporate governance and acquirer returns. The Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1851–1889. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01259.x
  40. Mulyana, A., Susilawati, E., Susanti, E., Kurniawan, R., Milasari, L. A., Setiajatnika, E., Armunanto, A., Yuniawati, R. I., Sirna, I. K., & Phety, D. T. O. (2024). Internal Audit. TOHAR MEDIA.
  41. Pesudo, D. A. A., Kurniadi, C. I., Martono, S., Theotama, G., & Matitaputty, J. S. (2023). Factors Affecting Audit Quality of BPKP–Central Java Chapter. Perspektif Akuntansi, 6(1), 56–73.
  42. Purba, R. B., & Umar, H. (2021). Kualitas Audit & Deteksi Korupsi. Merdeka Kreasi Group.
  43. Rya Aristia Lestari, R. (2023). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Profesionalisme, Pengalaman Kerja, Dan Time Budget Pressure Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Etika Auditor Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Kota Pekanbaru Tahun 2023). Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
  44. Salehi, M., Komeili, F., & Daemi Gah, A. (2019). The impact of financial crisis on audit quality and audit fee stickiness: evidence from Iran. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 17(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2017-0025
  45. Samosir, D. (2016). Penologi dan pemasyarakatan. Nuansa Aulia.
  46. Samosir, M., Sitorus, E. T., Nainggolan, R. P., & Marpaung, O. (2022). Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di DKI Jakarta). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan Jayakarta, 3(02), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.53825/japjayakarta.v3i02.122
  47. Sloan, R. G. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? Accounting Review, 289–315.
  48. Stulz, R. (1990). Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90011-N
  49. Tjeng, P. S., & Nopianti, R. (2021). The Effect of Auditor’s Technical Abilities on the Quality of Financial Statement Information. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 13(6), 129.
  50. Utami, A. P., Vinalia, N., Febriyan, I., Putra, B. G., & Manurung, H. (2024). Peran Audit internal atas kualitas Pemeriksaan Laporan keuangan yang dilakukan oleh audit eksternal pada sebuah perusahaan. Jurnal Rimba: Riset Ilmu Manajemen Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 2(1), 54–63.
  51. Wahyuni, P. D. (2022). Pengaruh good corporate governance, leverage dan kualitas audit terhadap integritas laporan keuangan pada emiten BUMN. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 15(1).
  52. Walid, T. (2021). Cost Stickiness: Analysis and Determinants. Case Study of Saudi Companies. Theoretical Economics Letters, 11(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2021.112017
  53. Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441–1471. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 275 times
PDF
: 13 times