Systematic literature review: implementation of inclusive education policies in Indonesia: a state administration perspective

  • Daniel T Todapa 
    Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Panca Marga Palu
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study thoroughly investigated the implementation of inclusive education policies in Indonesia, focusing specifically on the state administration perspective. Using a systematic literature review (SLR) approach, the research meticulously identifies meticulously identified the main challenges encountered and proposes proposed effective solutions for policy implementation. The key themes highlighted in this study include the urgent need for improved educational facilities, comprehensive teacher training programs, and the development of flexible teaching methods tailored to the individual needs of each student. Additionally, the findings underscore underscored the critical importance of stakeholder collaboration and the continuous assessment of policies to adequately meet the diverse needs of all students. This comprehensive and in-depth analysis not only contributed to a more inclusive and equitable education system in Indonesia but also provided valuable insights that are essential for future policy enhancements. By addressing these issues in detail, the study aimed to pave the way for more effective and inclusive educational practices across the nation.
Keywords
  • Inclusive Education
  • Policy Implementation
  • State Admnistration
  • Teacher Training
  • Community Involvement
References
  1. Anjana, A., & Choudhuri, R. (2018). Identification of Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Research. Science and Education Publishing, 6(6), 592–595. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-6-2
  2. Astuti, D., & Sudrajat, S. (2020). Promoting Inclusive Education for Social Justice in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.037
  3. Bariqi, M. D. (2018). Pelatihan Dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. 5.
  4. CASP. (2023, January). CASP Checklists. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
  5. Chong, S. C., Teo, W. Z., & Shorey, S. (2023). Exploring the perception of parents on children’s screentime: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Springer Nature, 94(3), 915–925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02555-9
  6. Dewi, N. K. (2017). Manfaat Program Pendidikan Inklusi Untuk AUD. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 6(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpa.v6i1.15657
  7. Fadilah, M., Utari, P., & Wijaya, M. (2022). Government Communication in Implementing Inclusive Education for Working Towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Kne Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i5.10592
  8. Hoover, R. S., & Koerber, A. L. (2011). Using NVivo to answer the challenges of qualitative research in professional communication: Benefits and best practices tutorial. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., 54(1), 68–82.
  9. Junaidi, A. R. (2019). Inclusive education in east java: The case of inclusive education policy and practice in east java, Indonesia. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2019).
  10. Khayati, N., Muna, F., Oktaviani, E. D., & Hidayatullah, A. (2020). Peranan Guru Dalam Pendidikan Inklusif Untuk Pencapaian Program Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (SDG’s). Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, 4(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.32585/jkp.v4i1.440
  11. Kusnia, N. (2019). Sumber Daya Dalam Implementasi Kebijakan pendidikan Inklusi di SDN Betet 1 Kediri. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.26740/jdmp.v3n1.p25-30
  12. Li, S. (2024). Principalship Experiences on Inclusive Education: A Systematic Review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12(02), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2024.122012
  13. Loreman, T., Forlin, C., & Sharma, U. (2014). Measuring indicators of inclusive education: A systematic review of the literature. In International Perspectives on Inclusive Education (pp. 165–187). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  14. Makoelle, T. M. (2014). Inclusive Education: Are We There? Some Global Challenges, Contradictions and Anomalies. 5(3), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09766634.2014.11885634
  15. Matondang, Z. (2010). Kompetensi Profesional Guru SMK Bidang Keahlian Teknik Bangunan di Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 16(6), 638–647. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v16i6.492
  16. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Public Library of Science, 6(7), e1000097–e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  17. Nisak, Z. H. (2018). Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan Inklusif di Indonesia. Primary Education Journal (PEJ), null, null. https://doi.org/10.30631/pej.v2i1.18
  18. Nurfadhillah, S., Sulistiyani, P. S., & Adawiyah, R. (2022). Analisis Penyelenggaraan Sekolah Inklusi di SDN Sukasari 5. TSAQOFAH, 2(6), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v2i6.632
  19. Oktarini, W. (2022). Pelatihan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif untuk Peningkatan Keterampilan Guru Anak Usia Dini. JPPM (Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat), 6(2), 373. https://doi.org/10.30595/jppm.v6i2.10347
  20. Osama, T., Brindley, D., Majeed, A., Murray, K. A., Shah, H., Toumazos, M., Velthoven, M. H. van, Car, J., Wells, G., & Meinert, E. (2018). Teaching the relationship between health and climate change: A systematic scoping review protocol. BMJ, 8(5), e020330–e020330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020330
  21. PRADANA, A. E. (2016). Evaluasi Peraturan Bupati Sidoarjo Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pendidikan Khusus Dan Layanan Pendidikan Khusus. PUBLIKA, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.26740/publika.v4n7.p%25p
  22. Rasmitadila, Humaira, M. A., Rachmadtullah, R., & Aliyyah, R. R. (2021). Perceptions of Student Teachers on Collaborative Relationships Between University and Inclusive Elementary Schools: A Case Study in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 20(10), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.10.15
  23. Rasmitadila, R., Humaira, M. A., Rachmadtullah, R., Sesrita, A., Laeli, S., Muhdiyati, I., & Firmansyah, W. (2022). Teacher Perceptions of University Mentoring Programs Planning for Inclusive Elementary Schools: A Case Study in Indonesia. International Journal of Special Education (Ijse), 36(2). https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2021.36.18
  24. Rrofiah, K. (2023). Inclusive Education at Universitas Negeri Surabaya: Perceptions and Realities of Students With Disabilities. International Journal of Special Education (Ijse), 38(2), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2023.38.18
  25. Saaiq, M., & Ashraf, B. (2017). Modifying “Pico” Question into “Picos” Model for More Robust and Reproducible Presentation of the Methodology Employed in A Scientific Study. National Institutes of Health, 6(3), 390–392.
  26. Sania, S. (2019). Kebijakan Permendiknas Tentang Penyelenggaraan Pedidikan Inklusi. PRODU: Prokurasi Edukasi Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, null, null. https://doi.org/10.15548/p-prokurasi.v1i1.3325
  27. Shaeffer, S. (2019). Inclusive education: A prerequisite for equity and social justice. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev., 20(2), 181–192.
  28. Sinha, A. (2022). Development of research network on Quantum Annealing Computation and Information using Google Scholar data. Royal Society, 381(2241). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0413
  29. Suchek, N., & Franco, M. (2024). Inter-organisational cooperation oriented towards sustainability involving SMEs: A systematic literature review. J. Knowl. Econ., 15(1), 1952–1972.
  30. Tummons, J. (2014). Using software for qualitative data analysis: Research outside paradigmatic boundaries. In Studies in Qualitative Methodology (pp. 155–177). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  31. Wiltshier, F. (2011). Researching With NVivo.
  32. Zamawe, F. C. (2015). The implication of using NVivo software in qualitative data analysis: Evidence-based reflections. Malawi Med. J., 27(1), 13–15.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 469 times
PDF
: 41 times