Acceptance of virtual reality-based hadith learning model with technology acceptance model (TAM) approach

Abstract

The use of Virtual Reality (VR) technology in education is growing rapidly, including in the context of Islamic learning. This study aims to examine the acceptance of the VR-based Hadith learning model among students of the Islamic Religious Education Study Program of the Riau Islamic University .  This study involved a population of 128 students who were active in the 2023/2024 academic year and took Hadith courses. The census method was used for sampling, so that the entire population became the research sample. Data were gathered using a questionnaire designed to assess the study's variables, employing a 5-point Likert scale. The analysis was performed using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) technique with the Partial a Squares (PLS) approach. This method was chosen due to its capability to manage intricate models with numerous latent variables and indicators, and its flexibility regarding data distribution assumptions. The results showed that perceived usefulness has a significant positive effect on the intention to use VR for Hadith learning. Meanwhile, Perceived Ease of Use does not have a significant effect on intention to use. These findings indicate the importance of considering the perceived benefits of VR technology in increasing its adoption in the Islamic religious education environment. This research also contributes to the educational literature by emphasizing the importance of technology acceptance and adoption in the context of Islamic religious education.
Keywords
  • Virtual Reality
  • Learning
  • Hadith
  • Technology Acceptance Model
References
  1. Allcoat, D., & von Mühlenen, A. (2018). Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance, emotion and engagement. Research in Learning Technology, 26. DOI: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2141
  2. Asad, M. M., Naz, A., Churi, P., & Tahanzadeh, M. M. (2021). Virtual reality as a pedagogical tool to enhance experiential learning: a systematic literature review. Education Research International, 2021(1), 7061623. DOI: 10.1155/2021/7061623
  3. Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003
  4. Chen, Y. L. (2016). The effects of virtual reality learning environment on student cognitive and linguistic development. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 637-646. DOI: 10.1007/s40299-016-0291-6
  5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  6. Duarte, M. L., Santos, L. R., Júnior, J. G., & Peccin, M. S. (2020). Learning anatomy by virtual reality and augmented reality. A scope review. Morphologie, 104(347), 254-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.morpho.2020.07.003
  7. Fussell, S. G., & Truong, D. (2022). Using virtual reality for dynamic learning: an extended technology acceptance model. Virtual Reality, 26(1), 249-267. DOI: 10.1007/s10055-021-00512-1
  8. Jang, J., Ko, Y., Shin, W. S., & Han, I. (2021). Augmented reality and virtual reality for learning: An examination using an extended technology acceptance model. IEEE Access, 9, 6798-6809. DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3068701
  9. Karman, K., Maslani, M., & As-Sa'diyah, M. M. (2023). The Effect of Using the Two Stay Two Stray Learning Strategy on Students' Learning Outcomes in Al-Qur'an-Hadith Subjects. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Journal of Islamic Education, 14(2), 371-385. DOI: 10.20414/atjpi.v14i2.610
  10. Lee, E. A. L., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). Learning with virtual reality: Its effects on students with different learning styles. In Transactions on Edutainment IV (pp. 79-90). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15399-0_8
  11. Lee, E. A. L., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1424-1442. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.003
  12. Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14, 81-95. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
  13. Malikah, N., Hidayatullah, F., Anitah, S., & Mudjiman, H. (2016). Bifilar Cooperative Learning Model for Hadith Memorizing Skill in Quran-Hadith in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Ponorogo Regency, Indonesia. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(11), 211-220. URL: https://www.ijern.com/journal/2016/November-2016/17.pdf
  14. Niam, Z. W. (2021). Implication of Problem Based Learning Model in Al-Quran Hadith Learning towards the internalization of Islamic values at MA Nurul Ummah Yogyakarta. Al Ghazali, 4(2), 126-143. URL: https://journal.staim-tulungagung.ac.id/index.php/al-ghazali/article/view/165
  15. Osadchyi, V., Chemerys, H., Osadcha, K., Kruhlyk, V. S., Koniukhov, S., & Kiv, A. (2020). Conceptual model of learning based on the combined capabilities of augmented and virtual reality technologies with adaptive learning systems. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 2731, pp. 328-340). URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2731/paper_16.pdf
  16. Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.3.150
  17. Pantelidis, V. S. (2009). Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2, 59-70. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.3.150
  18. Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Lourdeaux, D., Thouvenin, I., & Valléry, G. (2020). User acceptance of virtual reality: an extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(11), 993-1007. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1803003
  19. Saharuddin, S., Rusmin, M., Hidayat, M. Y., & Majid, J. (2024). Project based Learning: A Learning Model that Can Improve Learning Outcomes of Al-Qur'an Hadith. Al Asma: Journal of Islamic Education, 6(1), 79-87. URL: http://jurnal.stainkudus.ac.id/index.php/al-asma
  20. Salzman, M. C., Dede, C., Loftin, R. B., & Chen, J. (1999). A model for understanding how virtual reality aids complex conceptual learning. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 8(3), 293-316. DOI: 10.1162/105474699566301
  21. Sprenger, D. A., & Schwaninger, A. (2021). Technology acceptance of four digital learning technologies (classroom response system, classroom chat, e-lectures, and mobile virtual reality) after three months' usage. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 8. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-021-00200-3
  22. Syafril, S. D., Asril, Z., Engkizar, E., Zafirah, A., Agusti, F. A., & Sugiharta, I. (2021, February). Designing prototype model of virtual geometry in mathematics learning using augmented reality. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1796, No. 1, p. 012035). IOP Publishing. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012035
  23. Shen, C. W., Ho, J. T., Kuo, T. C., & Luong, T. H. (2017, April). Behavioral intention of using virtual reality in learning. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (pp. 129-137). DOI: 10.1145/3041021.3051382
  24. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  25. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  26. Zhou, Y., Ji, S., Xu, T., & Wang, Z. (2018). Promoting knowledge construction: A model for using virtual reality interaction to enhance learning. Procedia Computer Science, 130, 239-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.042