Design of Sekolah Penggerak principal leadership in implementing best practices

Abstract

This research aims to determine the leadership design of Sekolah Penggerak principals in instilling good practices in high schools in East OKU Regency. The method used in this research is research and development. The Research and Development (R&D) research procedure used in this research adopted the ADDIE model which consists of five stages, namely: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The results of the research show that the initial conditions for the development of Sekolah Penggerak for school principals in implementing good practices in SMA East OKU Regency still require adaptive school planning and management to adapt to current developments and ensure quality learning. The Sekolah Penggerak principal's leadership design in instilling good practices is presented in units such as the Sekolah Penggerak program, school operational management working group, mentoring activities by the principal, and mentoring of the principal. The feasibility of the leadership design was declared feasible to implement, with an average score of 83.4% on the feasibility criteria and 80.73% on the material validator. This research could be groundbreaking in understanding how school leadership can influence best practices in secondary schools and provide valuable new insights for educational practitioners, researchers, and policymakers. This research can make a significant contribution to our understanding of how school leadership can improve best practices at the high school level, as well as provide a foundation for further research in this area.
Keywords
  • Driving School
  • High School
  • Leadership Design
  • School’s Principal
References
  1. AlAjmi, M. K. (2022). The impact of digital leadership on teachers’ technology integration during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kuwait. International Journal of Educational Research, 112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101928
  2. Armstrong, A. J., Holmes, C. M., & Henning, D. (2020). A changing world, again. How Appreciative Inquiry can guide our growth. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100038
  3. Balyer, A., & Hakan Karatas, B. A. (2015). School Principals’ Roles in Establishing Collaborative Professional Learning Communities at Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1340–1347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.387
  4. Brown, C., & Flood, J. (2020). The three roles of school leaders in maximizing the impact of Professional Learning Networks: A case study from England. International Journal of Educational Research, 99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101516
  5. Hariyati, N., Sholeh, M., & Islamiah, N. (2023). Transformational Leadership in The Implementation of Sekolah Penggerak ’ s Program. 6(3), 414–424.
  6. Kemendikbud. (2021). Ministry of Education and Culture Launches Mobilizing School Program.
  7. Langgulung, H. (2003). Principles of Islamic Education. Pustaka Al Husna Baru.
  8. Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal Instructional Leadership, Teacher Self-Efficacy, and Teacher Professional Learning in China: Testing a Mediated-Effects Model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 505–528.
  9. Ly, B. (2023). Inclusion Leadership and Employee Work Engagement: The Role of Organizational Commitment in Cambodian Public Organization. Asia Pacific Management Review. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.06.003
  10. Mulyasa. (2009a). Become a Professional School Principal. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  11. Mulyasa. (2009b). School-Based Management. remaja rosdakarya.
  12. Nasution. (2009). Curriculum Principles. Bumi Aksara.
  13. Navaridas, N. F., Emeterio, M. C.-S., Fernández-Ortiz, R., & Arias-Oliva, M. (2020). The strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106481
  14. Purwanto. (2008). Educational Administration and Supervision. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
  15. Romero, M., Bedoya, J., Yanez-Pagan, M., Silveyra, M., & C, R. de H. a. (2022). Direct vs indirect management training: Experimental evidence from schools in Mexico. Journal of Development Economics, 154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102779
  16. Rosser, A., & Fahmi, M. (2018). The political economy of teacher management reform in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 61, 72–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.12.005
  17. Rosyid, R. Y. (2021). The Influence of Participatory Leadership Principles and Organizational Commitment To Teacher Performance Senior High School. JKP | Jurnal Kepemimpinan Pendidikan, 4(1), 527–533.
  18. Sagala, S. (2008). Culture and Reinventing Educational Organizations. Alfabeta.
  19. Santosa, G. (2005). Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodology. Prestasi Pustaka.
  20. Satriawan, W., Santika, I. D., & Naim, A. (2021). Teacher Mobilization and School Transformation in the Framework of Appreciative Inquiry. Al-Idarah : Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/alidarah.v11i1.7633
  21. Seufert, C., Oberdörfer, S., Roth, A., Grafe, S., Lugrin, J.-L., & Latoschik, M. E. (2022). Classroom management competency enhancement for student teachers using a fully immersive virtual classroom. Computers & Education, 179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104410
  22. Shen, J., Ma, X., Mansberger, N., Wu, H., Palmer, L. A. B., & Sue Poppink a, P. L. R. a. (2021). The relationship between growth in principal leadership and growth in school performance: The teacher perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101023
  23. Sihotang, H., Sibagariang, D., & Murniarti, E. (2021). The Role of Teachers in Independent Learning Education in Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan., 14(2).
  24. Sudarmanto. (2022). THE INFLUENCE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPAL COMMUNICATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SCHOOL LEADERSHIP IN THE SEKOLAH PENGGERAK PROGRAM. Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Kota Probolinggo.
  25. Sugiyono. (2011). Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods and R&D. Alfabeta.
  26. Sugiyono. (2017). Qualitative Quantitative Research Methods and R&D. Alfabeta.
  27. Syafi’i, F. F. (2021). Freedom to learn: Sekolah Penggerak. PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN DASAR “Merdeka Belajar Dalam Menyambut Era Masyarakat 5.0,”November, 46–47.
  28. Wahjosumidjo. (2007). Principal Leadership. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  29. Wang, T. (2016). School Leadership and Professional Learning Community: Case Study of Two Senior High Schools in Northeast China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 202–216.
  30. Xu, B., Chen, N. S., & Guang, C. (2020). Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-Based online discussion learning. Computers & Education, 157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103956
  31. Yan Liu a, M. S. B. (2018). School factors that are related to school principals’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.04.002
  32. Zamjani, I., Aditomo, A., Pratiwi, I., Solihin, L., Hijriani, I., Utama, B., Simatupang, S. M., Djunaedi, F., Amani, N. Z., & Widiaswati, D. (2020). Academic Manuscript Sekolah Penggerak Program. Pusat Penelitian Kebijkan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kemdikbud.