An effect of dynamic logistics capabilities on courier’s business performance

  • Noneng Nurjanah 
    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia; Universitas Logistik dan Bisnis Internasional
    Indonesia
  • Agus Rahayu
    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Lili Adi Wibowo
    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Nanang Fattah
    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
    Indonesia

Abstract

Courier companies face environmental challenges influenced by the development of e-commerce businesses, demanding high service quality and reliability in meeting consumer demand. Courier companies demand to
immediately adjust company strategies to be able to survive in competitive market conditions, the only way is to continue to keep dynamic on internal capability. This study develops and tests a model of the relationship between dynamic logistic capabilities, environmental turbulence, and business performance. As quantitative research, a survey was used to collect data. A sample of 70 valid answers from courier company members of the Association of Indonesian Express Delivery, Postal, and Logistics Services Companies(ASPERINDO) was treated through the Partial Least Square (PLS) method. The research results show a full mediation relationship between dynamic logistics capability and business performance, given the proportion of the impact of dynamic logistics capabilities on business performance (72.7%) identified in this study. As a result, the main result points out that the positive correlation between dynamic logistics capabilities and business performance strengthens the relationship evidence in the literature that dynamic logistics capabilities contribute to business performance, that is, sales growth, delivery reliability and security.
Keywords
  • Logistics Service Innovation Dynamic Logistics Capabilities Business Performance Turbulent Environment Courier
References
  1. Acar, A. Z. (2020). The mediating role of value innovation between market orientation and business performance: evidence from the logistics industry. In Int. J. Business Innovation and Research (Vol. 21, Issue 4).
  2. Briggs, E., Landry, T. D., & Daugherty, P. J. (2010). Investigating the influence of velocity performance on satisfaction with third party logistics service. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 640–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.06.004
  3. Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Cooper, M. B. (2002). Supply Chain Logistics Management.
  4. Cadogan, J. W., Cui, C. C., & Li, E. K. Y. (2003). Export market-oriented behavior and export performance: The moderating roles of competitive intensity and technological turbulence. In International Marketing Review (Vol. 20, Issue 5, pp. 493–513).
  5. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation , firm innovation capability , and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515–524.
  6. Chapman, R. L., Soosay, C., & Kandampully, J. (2002). Perspectives Innovation in logistic services and the new business model : a conceptual framework. Managing Service Quality, 12(6), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520210451849
  7. Chapman, R. L., Soosay, C., & Kandampully, J. (2003). Innovation in logistic services and the new business model: A conceptual framework. In International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management (Vol. 33, Issue 7, pp. 630–650). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030310499295
  8. Daugherty, P. J., Chen, H., & Ferrin, B. G. (2011). Organizational structure and logistics service innovation. International Journal of Logistics Management, 22(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574091111127543
  9. Flint, D. J., Larsson, E., Gammelgaard, B., & Mentzer, J. T. (2005). LOGISTICS INNOVATION: A CUSTOMER VALUE-ORIENTED SOCIAL PROCESS. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2005.tb00196.x
  10. Grawe, S. J. (2009). Logistics innovation: A literature-based conceptual framework. In The International Journal of Logistics Management (Vol. 20, Issue 3, pp. 360–377). https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090911002823
  11. Gunasekaran, A., & Kobu, B. (2007). Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: A review of recent literature (1995-2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 45(12), 2819–2840. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600806513
  12. Gupta, V. K., Niranjan, S., & Markin, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the mediating role of generative and acquisitive learning through customer relationships. Review of Managerial Science, 14(5), 1123–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00327-6
  13. Hanvanich, S., Sivakumar, K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2006). The relationship of learning and memory with organizational performance: The moderating role of turbulence. In Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (Vol. 34, Issue 4, pp. 600–612). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070306287327
  14. Heirati, N., O’Cass, A., Schoefer, K., & Siahtiri, V. (2016). Do professional service firms benefit from customer and supplier collaborations in competitive, turbulent environments? Industrial Marketing Management, 55, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.01
  15. Hendra Fachrudin, D., Rahayu, A., Fattah, N., & Adi Wibowo, L. (2021). The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Business Model Innovation on the Relationship Between Environment Turbulence and Firm Performance.
  16. Hina, S. M., Hassan, G., Parveen, M., & Arooj, S. (2021). Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Firm Performance through Organizational Learning: The Moderating Role of Environmental Turbulence. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 34(1), 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21343
  17. Hung, K. P., & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(10–11), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.06.006
  18. Ismail, F., & Kusumawardhani, A. (2017). ANALYSIS OF INFLUENCE OF STRATEGIC ACTION, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT ORIENTATION AND INNOVATION IN LOGISTICS TO FIRM PERFORMANCE (Study at Sea Transportation Service Company Operating In Port of Tanjung Emas Semarang). Jurnal Bisnis STRATEGI •, 26(2), 138–145.
  19. Izzah, N., Rifai, D., & Yao, L. (2016). Relationship-courier partner logistics and e-commerce enterprises in Malaysia: A review. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i9/88721
  20. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70.
  21. Kucukaltan, B., Irani, Z., & Aktas, E. (2016). Computers in Human Behavior A decision support model for identification and prioritization of key performance indicators in the logistics industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.045
  22. Liu, W., Sun, L., Li, J., Li, W., & Zhang, H. (2016, July 24). Research on The Dynamic Capability Affecting the Growth Performance of Logistics Service Integrator. International COnference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS).
  23. Lynch, D. F., Keller, S. B., & Ozment, J. (2000). The effects of logistics capabilities and strategy on firm performance International Trade and Transportation and Local Development View project INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT View project. In Article in Journal of Business Logistics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284046901
  24. Matwiejczuk, R. (2019). On the research concerning the relations between logistics and strategic management – towards the strategic logistics concept in management. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego We Wrocławiu, 63(6), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2019.6.14
  25. Morash, E. A. ;, Droge, C. L. M., & Vickery, S. K. (1996). Strategic logistics capabilities for competitive advantage and firm success. In Journal of Business Logistics (Vol. 17).
  26. Moullin, M. (2007). Guest editorial Performance measurement definitions organisational excellence. International Jpurnal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 20(3), 181–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860710743327
  27. Sakchutchawan, S., Hong, P. C., Callaway, S. K., & Kunnathur, A. (2011). Innovation and Competitive Advantage: Model and Implementation for Global Logistics. International Business Research, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v4n3p10
  28. Soosay, C. A., & Chapman, R. L. (2006). An empirical examination of performance measurement for managing continuous innovation in logistics. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.257
  29. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  30. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal (Vol. 18).
  31. Wang, M. (2016). Logistics Capability, Supply Chain Uncertainty and Risk, and Logistics Performance: An Empirical Analysis of the Australian Courier Industry.
  32. Wasielewska-Marszałkowska, I. (2021). Identification of Innovativeness Provided by Logistics Service Providers. In European Research Studies Journal: Vol. XXIV (Issue 1).
  33. Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2015). Strategic Management and Business Policy Globalozation, Innovation and Sustainability.
  34. Wong, S. K. S. (2014). Impacts of environmental turbulence on entrepreneurial orientation and new product success. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2013-0032
  35. Zhao, M., Dröge, C., & Stank, T. P. (2001a). The Effects Of Logistics Capabilities On Firm Performance: Customer-Focused Versus Information-Focused Capabilities. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00005.x

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 386 times
PDF
: 19 times