Russia vs America cyber war: space technology mastery competition

Abstract

Mastery of computers and information systems in international relations is one of the elements of a country's new power. In the context of cyber warfare, Russia and the United States are trying to modernize their technology to secure their countries in the event of an attack from the opposing party. This research aims to analyze the space technology competition carried out by two major countries, namely Russia and the United States, to achieve Great Power status in the international world. This research focuses on the technological achievements of Russia and the United States in the field of space and their implementation in the form of cyber warfare. A qualitative case study is the research method chosen by the researcher. The research stages used by researchers are divided into data collection stages and data reduction, and the next stage is that researchers conduct analysis using data reduction techniques, namely summarizing, selecting, and focusing on the things needed in this study. The results of this study show that national security priorities are number one, and especially defense priorities for the United States are no longer terrorism but great power competition. NATO is an alliance or political tool that the US relies on to achieve great power.
Keywords
  • Russia
  • AS
  • NATO
  • Cyber Warfare
  • Space Technology Hegemony
  • Great Power Politics
  • Cyber Attack
References
  1. Antoni, Ntorina, Giannopapa, Christina, & Adriaensen, Maarten. (2020). Space and Security Programs in the Largest European Countries. Handbook of Space Security, 2(2), 1225–1263.
  2. Bumiller, Elisabeth, & Shanker, Thom. (2011). War evolves with drones, some tiny as bugs. The New York Times, 19.
  3. Chabrow, Eric. (2009). Cyber Cold War: U.S. Vs. Russia. Retrieved from govinfosecurity website: https://www.govinfosecurity.com/blogs/cyber-cold-war-us-vs-russia-p-227
  4. Craig, A. J., & Valeriano, Brandon. (2018). Realism and cyber conflict: Security in the digital age. Realism in Practice, 85(3), 1–11.
  5. Creswell, John W., & Creswell, J. David. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  6. Culture.ru. (2022). Space Race. Retrieved November 16, 2022, from culture.ru website: https://www.culture.ru/materials/50445/kosmicheskaya-gonka
  7. Culture, Ministry of Chuvash. (2018). History of space exploration. Retrieved November 16, 2022, from culture.cap.ru website: https://culture.cap.ru/action/activity/sobitiya/novogodnie-meropriyatiya-v-chuvashskoj-respublike/denj-kosmonavtiki/istoriya-osvoeniya-kosmosa
  8. Demir, Sertif. (2022). The 2022 Russia-Ukraine war: reasons and impacts. Bölgesel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 13–40.
  9. Evgeniy Korenev. (2022). NATO Space Strategy: Implications for Russia and its Allies. Eurasia Expert. Retrieved from https://eurasia.expert/kosmicheskaya-strategiya-nato-posledstviya-dlya-rossii-i-ee-soyuznikov/
  10. Hansel, Mischa. (2023). Great power narratives on the challenges of cyber norm building. Policy Design and Practice, 6(2), 182–197.
  11. Ignatius, David. (2022). Opinion | The U.S.-Russia conflict is heating up — in cyberspace. Retrieved from washingtonpost website: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/06/07/us-russia-conflict-is-heating-up-cyberspace/
  12. Kallberg, Jan. (2012). Designer satellite collisions from covert cyber war. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 6(1), 124–136.
  13. Lissack, Michael. (2021). Cybernetics and Control. In Handbook of Systems Sciences (pp. 87–106). Springer.
  14. Lueschow, Holger, & Pelaez, Roberto. (2020). Satellite Communication for Security and Defense. Handbook of Space Security: Policies, Applications and Programs, 779–796.
  15. Merrin, William. (2018). Digital war: A critical introduction. Routledge.
  16. Moltz, James. (2011). The politics of space security: strategic restraint and the pursuit of national interests. Stanford University Press.
  17. Moltz, James Clay. (2019). The changing dynamics of twenty-first-century space power. Journal of Strategic Security, 12(1), 15–43.
  18. Nagy, Viktor. (2012). The geostrategic stuggle in cyberspace between the United States, China, and Russia. AARMS, 11(1), 13–26.
  19. Novikov, Dmitriĭ Aleksandrovich. (2015). Cybernetics: from past to future (Vol. 47). Springer.
  20. Paul, Kari. (2022). ‘We are not ready’: a cyber expert on US vulnerability to a Russian attack. Retrieved November 16, 2022, from theguardian website: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/mar/10/us-russia-cyber-attack-prepared
  21. Roscosmos. (2022). How it works. Satellite connection. Retrieved November 18, 2022, from Rostec.ru website: https://rostec.ru/news/kak-eto-rabotaet-sputnikovaya-svyaz/
  22. Rynning, Sten. (2019). NATO’s futures: The Atlantic Alliance between power and purpose. NATO Defense College.
  23. Shuya, Mason. (2018). Russian cyber aggression and the new Cold War. Journal of Strategic Security, 11(1), 1–18.
  24. Smith, Nicholas Ross. (2019). A new cold war?: Assessing the current US-Russia relationship. Springer.
  25. Stoddart, Kristan. (2022). Cyberwar: Attacking Critical Infrastructure. In Cyberwarfare: Threats to Critical Infrastructure (pp. 147–225). Springer.
  26. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alphabeta.