Empowering traditional weaving artisans through development communication structures in TTS regency

Abstract

This research was conducted referring to the theoretical elements of development communication, while the practical techniques used were not considered. The purpose of this study is to describe the conditions and problems faced by the community in Timor Tengah Selatan Regency (TTS), especially those who carry out people's weaving business and analyze the development communication that occurs in the TTS Regency community. Qualitative methods are used to interpret real-world social problems, including people's behavior, perceptions, and experiences. This study used secondary data. Researchers use dissertations, scientific journals, the internet, and data from related agencies to gather this data. Furthermore, the authors conducted direct interviews with a group of people's weaving craftsmen under the guidance of the Department of Trade, Industry, Cooperatives, and SMEs in the TTS Regency. This study found that development communication in an area has not yet led to empowerment. On the other hand, the dynamics of power between the elderly and the younger generation will continue to be a hallmark of society. Therefore, development communication must be carried out to facilitate the communication structure of different local cultures, and to encourage empowerment not only for parents but also for the younger generation.
Keywords
  • Development Communication
  • Empowerment
  • People’s Weaving
References
  1. Amir, A. (2016). Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu, Motivasi Dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dirumah Sakit Daerah Madani Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah (Studi Perbandingan Antara Instalasi Kesehatan Jiwa Dan Umum). Katalogis, 4(7).
  2. Bushe, G. R. (2013). Generative process, generative outcome: The transformational potential of appreciative inquiry. In Organizational generativity: The appreciative inquiry summit and a scholarship of transformation (Vol. 4, pp. 89–113). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  3. Cangara, H. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi (Edisi Kedua), Jakarta: PT. In RajaGrafindo Persada.
  4. Covey, S. R. (2013). The 8th habit: From effectiveness to greatness. Simon and Schuster.
  5. Euriga, E., Boehme, M. H., & Amanah, S. (2021). Changing Farmers’ Perception towards Sustainable Horticulture: A Case Study of Extension Education in Farming Community in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 7(2), 225–240.
  6. Jay, H., Barry, R., Chuck, M., & Amit, S. (2014). Operations Management Sustainability and Supply Chain Management. Binus University.
  7. Johannisson, B. (2017). Networking and entrepreneurial growth. The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship, 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164214.ch18
  8. Kadir, K., & Amalia, R. R. (2016). Economic growth and poverty reduction: the role of the agricultural sector in rural Indonesia.
  9. Nanditha, A., Snehalatha, C., Raghavan, A., Vinitha, R., Satheesh, K., Susairaj, P., Simon, M., Selvam, S., Ram, J., & Kumar, A. P. N. (2018). The post-trial analysis of the Indian SMS diabetes prevention study shows persistent beneficial effects of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 142, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2018.05.042
  10. Nitti, F., Hardini, J., & Pharmawati, M. (2021). Tumbuhan Pewarna Alami dan Pengolahannya pada Tenun Ikat Amarasi di Desa Tunbaun, Kecamatan Amarasi Barat, Kabupaten Kupang, Nusa Tenggara Timur Natural Dyes Plant and Processing of Amarasi Woven Fabrics in The Village of Tunbaun, West Amarasi District, K. JURNAL M ETAMORFOSA, 09(01), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.24843
  11. Rahmawati, R., Mone, A., & Mustari, N. (2021). Pengaruh Partisipasi Masyarakat Terhadap Efektivitas Program Inovasi Desa Budi Daya Jamur Tiram Di Desa Jenetaesa Kecamatan Simbang Kabupaten Maros. Kajian Ilmiah Mahasiswa Administrasi Publik (KIMAP), 2(2), 590–604.
  12. Ratriyana, I. N., Setiawan, L. D., & Yudarwati, G. A. (2022). Development communication for youth empowerment in Indonesia’s renewable energy projects. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(4), 290–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.2007273
  13. Sabri, R. (2019). The Imperial Politics of Architectural Conservation. Springer.
  14. Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2023). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Taylor & Francis.
  15. Seran, W., Kaho, L. M. R., Mau, A. E., & Nomleni, B. B. (2022). Identification and Distribution of Plants that have the Potential as Natural Dyes for Ikat Weaving in Malacca District. JURNAL AGRIKAN (Agribisnis Perikanan), 15(2), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.52046/agrikan.v15i2.1312
  16. Setiawan, D. (2015). Pemanfaatan Bonus Demografi melalui Peningkatan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Sumatera Utara. JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 7(1), 1–9.
  17. Sulistiani, I. (2020). Komunikasi Pembangunan Partisipatif Pada Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Papua. Journal of Socio-Economics on Tropical Agriculture (Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Tropis)(JOSETA), 2(2).
  18. Sumardjo. (2014). Falsafah, Prinsip-Prinsip Dan Etika Profesi Dalam Penyuluhan. Sekolah Pascasarjana Ilmu Penyuluhan Pembangunan. IPB.
  19. Sumardjo. (2016). Kearifan Lokal Alternatif Menuju Modernisasi Dalam Penyuluhan Pembangunan.
  20. Todaro, M. P. (2022). The developed and developing world. Prentice Hall.
  21. Verawaty, V. (2019). Pengaruh BPK, Karakteristik Pemerintah dan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. MBIA, 18(2), 79–99.
  22. Vogelgesang, G. R., Leroy, H., & Avolio, B. J. (2013). The mediating effects of leader integrity with transparency in communication and work engagement/performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(3), 405–413.
  23. Widia, D. M., & Asriningtias, S. R. (2021). Cara Cepat dan Praktis Membangun Web Dinamis dengan PHP dan MySQL. Universitas Brawijaya Press.