Efforts to improve activities and results of student learning in civic education learning through Cooperative Learning model of Jigsaw type

Abstract

This research is motivated by the low activity and student learning outcomes in  Civic Education  subjects in class 11th social program 2 at Islamic Senior High School Number 2  Bukittinggi. The factors that cause low activity and student learning outcomes such as the lack of opportunities for students to explore potential, low motivation, learning models that are not varied. The purpose of this study was to obtain information on the increase in activity and student learning outcomes through the jigsaw type learning cooperative learning model in class 11th social program 2 at Islamic Senior High School Number 2  Bukittinggi. The type of this research is Classroom Action Research (CAR). The subject of the research was 25 people consisting of 18 female students and 7 male students. Based on the results of the study showed that there was an increase in activity in the first cycle of reading 60%, discussing 64%, listening to 64%, presenting 49.3%, asking 60%, making a summary of 26.67%, working on the test 42.67%. In cycle II I read 86.3%, discussed 86%, listened to 86%, presented 75.67, asked 83.67, made a summary of 68.33% and worked on the test 80%. From the results of the study it can be concluded that Civics learning using the jigsaw type learning cooperative learning model can improve learning activities and student learning outcomes in class 11th social program 2 at Islamic Senior High School Number 2  Bukittinggi.

Keywords
  • Learning activities
  • learning outcomes
  • jigsaw
  • civic education
References
  1. Anita, Lie. (2003). Cooperative Learning: Mempraktekkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang- Ruang Kelas. Jakarta: Grasindo
  2. Asep Jihad,dkk. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo
  3. Darmansyah. (2009). PTK Pedoman Praktis Bagi Guru dan Dosen. Padang: Sukabina Press
  4. Etin, Solihatin. (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran PKn. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  5. Etin, Solihatin,dkk. Cooperatif Learning : Analisis Model Pembelajaran IPS. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  6. Ghullam Hamdu, Lisa Agustina.Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol. 12 No. 1, April 2011 Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar Siswa Terhadap Pestasi Belajar Ipa Di Sekolah Dasar ((Studi Kasus terhadap Siswa Kelas IV SDN Tarumanagara Kecamatan Tawang Kota Tasikmalaya). http://jurnal.upi.edu/file/8-Ghullam_Hamdu1.pdf
  7. Hamzah.B.Uno. (2010). Profesi Kependidikan “Problema, Solusi dan Reformasi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
  8. ilhamzen09. Uji t Dua Sampel.https://freelearningji.wordpress.comApril 6, 2013
  9. Isjoni. (2009). Cooperative Learning: Efektifitas Pembelajaran Kelompok. Bandung: Alfabeta
  10. Iskandar. (2009). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas.Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press
  11. Iskandar, Agung. (2012). Strategi Penerapan PEndidikan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (ESD) di Sekolah. Jakarta: Bee Media indonesia
  12. Jamil , Suprihatiningrum. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran: Teori dan Aplikasi,. Jogjakarta: Ar- Ruzz Media
  13. Keke T. Aritonang. 11 Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur - No.10/Tahun ke-7/Juni 2008.Minat dan Motivasi dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa.http://www.bpkpenabur.or.id/
  14. Kunandar. (2008). Langkah Mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Sebagai Pengembangan Profesi Guru.Jakarta : Rajawali Pers
  15. Mujmal.I.W,dkk. (2013). e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Pendidikan Dasar (Volume 3 Tahun 2013). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Ips Kelas Viii Mts Nw Gereneng Kecamatan Sakra Timur Ntb Tahun Pelajaran. 2011/2012. http://pasca.undiksha.ac.id/
  16. Munandir. (2009). Kapita Selekta Pendidikan (Acuan Khusus: Pembelajaran dan Bimbingan)Jakarta: Pustaka Publisher
  17. Nana, Sudjana. (2009). Penialian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar.Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya
  18. Nur, Asma. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Padang: UNP Press. Padang: UNP Press
  19. Ridwan,Abdullah Sani. (2014. Pembelajaran saintifik untuk Impelementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  20. Rusman. (2011). Model- Model Pembelajaran: Pengembangan Profesonalisme Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
  21. Sardiman. (2010). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar- Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
  22. Sri, Untari. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berbasis Nilai Pancasila. Malang: UNM
  23. S. Nasution. (2004). Didaktik Asas- Asas Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  24. Syaiful, Bahri Djamarah,dkk. 2013. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
  25. Sofan,Amri. (2013). Pengembangan dan Model Pembelajaran dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya
  26. Sugiyono . Metode Penelitian Pendidikan : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R and D. Bandung: Alfabeta
  27. Sugiyono. (2000). Statistika Untuk Penelitian.Bandung:Alfabeta.
  28. Suryosubroto. (2009). Proses Belajar mengajar di Sekolah “wawasan baru, beberapa metode pendukung, dan beberapa komponen layanan khusus. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
  29. Trianto. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu “Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasinya dalam KTSP.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  30. Wina Sanjaya. (2013). Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group