Comparative study of consumer satisfaction offline shopping and online using e-commerce Tokopedia to loyalty during the Covid-19 pandemic

  • Irene Vikining Astuty R 
    Yogyakarta State University
    Indonesia
  • Kiromim Baroroh
    Yogyakarta State University
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to determine the comparison of consumer satisfaction shopping offline and online using e-commerce. Tokopedia towards covid-19 pandemic. The method used in this research is comparative descriptive using a quantitative and survey approach. The total population in this study was 280 people with a total sample of 165 respondents. The technique used was probability sampling with purposive sampling. This data collection uses observation and questionnaires. The data collected through a questionnaire was then processed using the SPSS 15.0 program. The results obtained show that the variable of consumer satisfaction when shopping online and offline has a significant difference so that it has an impact on consumer loyalty online and offline. The loyalty experienced by consumers shopping online tends to be less than the loyalty to shop directly. Where when consumers make transactions directly, consumers tend to be more daring in making decisions in shopping because consumers are able to choose, see and touch directly the goods or products to be purchased so that they will make their own commitment to the product, brand and store.
Keywords
  • Satisfaction Loyalty Consumer Online
  • Satisfaction Consumer Consumers
References
  1. Chou, S.-W., & Hsu, C.-S. (2016). Understanding online repurchase intention: social exchange theory and shopping habit. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 14(1), 19–45.
  2. Danang, S. (2013). Teori Kuesioner dan Analisis Data untuk Pemasaran dan Perilaku Konsumen. Graha Ilmu.
  3. Dewi, N. K., & Andri, G. (2012). Pengaruh iklan, citra merek, dan kepuasan konsumen terhadap loyalitas konsumen dalam menggunakan vaseline hand and body lotion di kota Padang (studi kasus di PT. Unilever cabang padang). Sumber, 6(1), 26.
  4. Felderhoff, C., Lyford, C., Malaga, J., Polkinghorne, R., Brooks, C., Garmyn, A., & Miller, M. (2020). Beef quality preferences: Factors driving consumer satisfaction. Foods, 9(3), 289.
  5. Harijanto, B., & Ariyanto, Y. (2017). Sistem Informasi Pengukuran Kepuasan Pelanggan (Studi Kasus Politeknik Negeri Malang). JURNAL ELTEK, 12(2), 42–52.
  6. Ismanto Setyabudi, D. (2014). Konsumen dan Pelayanan Prima. Gava Media.
  7. Kim, J. W., Lee, F., & Suh, Y. G. (2015). Satisfaction and loyalty from shopping mall experience and brand personality. Services Marketing Quarterly, 36(1), 62–76.
  8. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2018). Principles of Marketing, Seventeenth Edition. In Pearson.
  9. Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., Koshy, A., & Jha, M. (2013). Marketing management: a South Asian perspectives. Pearson.
  10. laura Hardilawati, W. (2020). Strategi bertahan UMKM di tengah pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomika, 10(1), 89–98.
  11. Malau, H. (2018). Manajemen Pemasaran Teori dan Aplikasi Pemasaran Era Tradisional Sampai Era Modernisasi Global. Alfabeta.
  12. Manap, A. (2016). Revolusi Manajemen Pemasaran. Mitra Wacana Media.
  13. Philip Kotler, G. A. (2012). Prinsip-Prinsip Pemasaran Edisi 13. Jilid 1. In Prinsip-Prinsip Pemasaran.
  14. Srivastava, M., & Kaul, D. (2016). Exploring the link between customer experience–loyalty–consumer spend. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31, 277–286.
  15. Suganya, V. (2018). A Comparative Study on Customer Satisfaction towards Online Shopping and Offline Shopping with special reference to Coimbatore District. Research Journal, 8.
  16. Suryani, T. (2013). Perilaku konsumen di era internet: Implikasinya pada strategi pemasaran. Graha Ilmu.
  17. Tjiptono, F. (2014). Pemasaran jasa–prinsip, penerapan, dan penelitian. Andi Offset.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 718 times
PDF
: 47 times