Financial accountability on local government and regional economic growth

Abstract

Audit opinions should be linked to regional economic growth as evidence of financial accountability. Previous research in Indonesia on government spending and regional economic growth has been inconsistent. Audit opinion of local government financial statements could result in discrepancies in the research findings. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is higher economic growth in local governments that obtain an unqualified audit opinion (UAO) compared to local governments that obtain a modified audit opinion (MAO). This study uses district and city governments in Indonesia from 2016 to 2020 as a sample. The Mann-Whitney test shows that local governments that receive an unqualified audit opinion (UAO) have higher economic growth than those that receive a modified audit opinion. The results of this study show empirically that local government financial accountability is associated with regional economic growth.
Keywords
  • audit opinion
  • economic growth. Local government
References
  1. Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Tucker, R. R. (2002). The Influence of Accounting and Auditing on a Country’s Economic Development. Review of Accounting and Finance, 1(3), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026990
  2. Arens, et. al. (2014). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach. Pearson Education.
  3. Basuki, A., Purwaningsih, Y., Soesilo, A., & Mulyanto. (2019). The Role of Regional Government Expenditures on Regional Economic Growth in Indonesia. 353(IcoSIHESS), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.2991/icosihess-19.2019.26
  4. Bediako, E. (2017). Accountancy and Sustainable Economic Development : A Case Study of Thailand. 8(22), 1–8.
  5. Cahyaningrum, P. H., & Fitriany, F. (2013). Pengaruh Modified Audit Opinion Terhadap Borrowing Cash Flow Dan Investment Cash Flow. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 10(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2013.05
  6. Deviani. (2016). Analisis Belanja Daaerah terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Pendidikan (Studi Empiris Kota dan Kabupaten di Sumatera Barat). Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 8(1), 1–13.
  7. Enthoven, A. J. H. (1986). Accountancy for economic development. Finance & Development, 24–29.
  8. Forrester, J. (2002). The Principal-Agent Model and Budget Theory” Budget Theory in The Public Sector.
  9. Ghozali Imam. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25.
  10. Haryanto, T. P. (2013). Pengaruh Pengeluaran Pemerintah Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Kabupaten/Kota Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2007-2011. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 2(3), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v2i3.1989
  11. Kuznets. (1976). Modern Economic Growth : and. 63(3), 247–258.
  12. Lin, Z., Jiang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2011). Do modified audit opinions have economic consequences? Empirical evidence based on financial constraints. China Journal of Accounting Research, 4(3), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2011.06.004
  13. Liu, J., & Lin, B. (2012). Government auditing and corruption control: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2012.01.002
  14. Luintel, K. B., Matthews, K., Minford, L., Valentinyi, A., & Wang, B. (2020). The role of Provincial Government Spending Composition in growth and convergence in China. Economic Modelling, 90(October 2019), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.04.024
  15. Michael C.Jensen, & H.Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X7690026X
  16. N. Greogory Mankiw. (2009). Macroeconomics (7th ed.). Worth Publishers.
  17. Putri, D. T., Azwardi, A., Marwa, T., & Andaiyani, S. (2018). Does Government Budget Drive Regional Economic Growth ? International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(5), 261–265.
  18. Räsänen, J., & Mäkelä, E. (2021). The effect of government spending on local economies during an economic downturn. European Economic Review, 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103697
  19. Saragih, G. V. V. R., & Hasibuan, A. N. (2020). the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia’S Opinion: Between Regional Financial Performance and Public Welfare (the Study on Regencies and Cities in Riau Province). Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 6(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v6i2.466
  20. Sjamsu Djohan, Zamruddin Hasid, D. S. (2016). Government Expenditure as Determinants of Economic Growth and Income Inequality of Inter-Province of the Islands in Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 7(22), 148-158–158.
  21. Sukirno, S. (2011). Makro Ekonomi Teori Pengantar.
  22. Tanaka, S. (2007). Engaging the Public in National Budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(2), 139–177. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v7-art12-en
  23. Tarigan, R. (2005). Ekonomi Regional. Teori dan Aplikasi. Bumi Aksara.
  24. Wang, C., Zhang, X., Ghadimi, P., Liu, Q., Lim, M. K., & Stanley, H. E. (2019). The impact of regional financial development on economic growth in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region: A spatial econometric analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 521, 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.103
  25. Wiyono, G. (2011). Merancang Penelitian Bisnis Dengan Alat Statistik SPSS & SmartPLS. Unit Penerbit Dan Percetakan STIM YKPN.
  26. Zimmerman, J. L. (1977). The Municipal Accounting Maze: An Analysis of Political Incentives. Journal of Accounting Research, 15, 107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490636